翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Oxford University Quidditch Club ・ Oxford University RFC ・ Oxford University Rowing Clubs ・ Oxford University Russian Society ・ Oxford University Scientific Society ・ Oxford University Scout and Guide Group ・ Oxford University Society of Belgium ・ Oxford University Society of Bibliophiles ・ Oxford University Society of Change Ringers ・ Oxford University Student Union ・ Oxford University Studies in the Enlightenment ・ Oxford University Tape Recording Society ・ Oxford University Wine Circle ・ Oxford University Wine Society ・ Oxford University Women's Boat Club ・ Oxford v Moss ・ Oxford Vaccine Group ・ Oxford Valley Mall ・ Oxford Valley, Pennsylvania ・ Oxford Village Historic District ・ Oxford West and Abingdon (UK Parliament constituency) ・ Oxford West Telephone ・ Oxford Wits ・ Oxford World's Classics ・ Oxford Youth Theatre ・ Oxford's Men ・ Oxford, Alabama ・ Oxford, Arkansas ・ Oxford, Cambridge and RSA Examinations ・ Oxford, Connecticut Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Oxford v Moss ： ウィキペディア英語版 Oxford v Moss ''Oxford v Moss'' (1979) 68 Cr App Rep 183 is an English criminal law case, dealing with theft, intangible property and information. The court ruled that information could not be deemed to be intangible property and therefore was incapable of being stolen within the Theft Act 1968. ==Facts== The defendant, Moss, was a University student and managed to obtain a proof copy of his forthcoming exam paper. It was accepted that he always intended to return the proof itself, and therefore could not be convicted of theft of the proof itself, however he was charged with stealing information belonging to the Senate of the University. The case was heard by the Liverpool Stipendiary Magistrate, and it was argued by the prosecution that the information itself was property capable of being stolen because it had attached to it a proprietary right of confidence, and once this was breached, the information itself had been stolen. It was argued by the defence that Section 4 of the Theft Act 1968 did not define a class of intangible property beyond a chose in action, and therefore information ''per se'' was not protected by the Theft Act 1968. The magistrate ruled that confidential information was not a form of property as defined by Section 4, and that confidence consisted in the right to control the publication of the proof and was a right over property rather than property in itself. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Oxford v Moss」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.